Key result
While baseline cardiopulmonary exercise testing was feasible in only 68% of cancer patients undergoing treatment, 84% had usable fitness tracker data and 93% completed baseline patient-reported surveys.
Why the study?
Can wearable sensor data and patient-reported outcomes accurately predict physical function in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy or HCT?
Observational (n=44)
Yes
Can wearable sensor data and patient-reported outcomes accurately predict physical function in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy or HCT?
Wearable sensor data combined with patient-reported symptom burden can feasibly and accurately predict physical function in cancer patients undergoing active treatment.
Clinical performance status is designed to be a measure of overall health, reflecting a patient's physiological reserve and ability to tolerate various forms of therapy. Currently, it is measured by a combination of subjective clinician assessment and patient-reported exercise tolerance in the context of daily living activities. In this study, we assess the feasibility of combining objective data sources and patient-generated health data (PGHD) to improve the accuracy of performance status assessment during routine cancer care. Patients undergoing routine chemotherapy for solid tumors, routine chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies, or hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) at one of four sites in a cancer clinical trials cooperative group were consented to a six-week prospective observational clinical trial (NCT02786628). Baseline data acquisition included cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and a six-minute walk test (6MWT). Weekly PGHD included patient-reported physical function and symptom burden. Continuous data capture included use of a Fitbit Charge HR (sensor). Baseline CPET and 6MWT could only be obtained in 68% of study patients, suggesting low feasibility during routine cancer treatment. In contrast, 84% of patients had usable fitness tracker data, 93% completed baseline patient-reported surveys, and overall, 73% of patients had overlapping sensor and survey data that could be used for modeling. A linear model with repeated measures was constructed to predict the patient-reported physical function. Sensor-derived daily activity, sensor-derived median heart rate, and patient-reported symptom burden emerged as strong predictors of physical function (marginal R2 0.429-0.433, conditional R2 0.816-0.822). Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Id NCT02786628.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wood et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Cancer (solid tumor malignancies, hematologic malignancies, or pre-hematopoietic cell transplant) (n=44). Wearable fitness tracker (Fitbit Charge HR) and patient-reported surveys was evaluated on Feasibility of obtaining physical performance testing, patient-reported surveys, and continuous sensor data (defined as >75% completion). While baseline cardiopulmonary exercise testing was feasible in only 68% of cancer patients undergoing treatment, 84% had usable fitness tracker data and 93% completed baseline patient-reported surveys.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: