Key result
Post-COVID RV strain remains persistently reduced at 13 months despite functional recovery.
Why the study?
Survivors of post-COVID-19 may experience persistent functional impairment and late cardiopulmonary sequelae, with unclear longitudinal changes in right ventricular systolic function and its clinical associations.
Cohort (n=49)
No
In post-COVID-19 survivors, functional and pulmonary capacity improved over time while RV systolic indices remained persistently reduced without significant longitudinal change, suggesting RV indices should not be used in isolation as markers of functional limitation.
Persistent RV strain reduction despite functional recovery may warrant surveillance; leaves open prognostic implications in post-COVID survivors.
Background: Survivors of post-COVID-19 may experience persistent functional impairment and late cardiopulmonary sequelae.The right ventricle (RV) is particularly susceptible to injury, and RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS), measured by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE), can detect subclinical RV systolic dysfunction.Objective: To evaluate longitudinal changes in RV systolic function, assessed by RVFWLS, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC), and tricuspid annular systolic velocity (S′), and to investigate their associations with functional capacity (30-second sit-to-stand test [30STS]), functional status (Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale [PCFS]), dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council [mMRC] scale), and carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO) in post-COVID-19 survivors.Methods: This observational analysis included participants from a prospective post-COVID-19 cohort evaluated at two follow-up visits (AV1 and AV2), approximately 4 and 13 months after the acute infection.Adults with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and analyzable transthoracic echocardiography using 2D-STE were included.Statistical significance was defined as a two-sided p < 0.05.Results: A total of 49 patients were included; 55.1% were women, the mean age was 50.7 ± 10.3 years, 63.3% had obesity, 77.6% required intensive care unit admission, and 67.3% underwent invasive mechanical ventilation.Performance on the 30STS improved (10.1 ± 3.3 vs 11.6 ± 3.1 repetitions; p = 0.004), and KCO increased (4.1 ± 0.7 vs 4.3 ± 0.8 mL/min/mmHg/L; p = 0.002), whereas mMRC scores (p = 0.43) and median PCFS scores (p = 0.11) remained unchanged.TAPSE decreased modestly but remained within the normal reference range (2.2 ± 0.3 vs 2.1 ± 0.2 cm; p = 0.03), while RVFWLS, FAC, and S′ showed no significant changes over time.Cross-sectional correlations between RV systolic indices and clinical outcomes were weak and nonsignificant at both AV1 and AV2 (|r| < 0.30; p > 0.05).Longitudinally, changes in RVFWLS were positively correlated with changes in KCO (r = 0.33; p = 0.05), whereas changes in FAC were inversely correlated with changes in PCFS scores (r = -0.35;p = 0.02).Conclusion: In this cohort of post-COVID-19 survivors, functional capacity and pulmonary diffusing capacity improved over time, whereas RVFWLS remained persistently reduced without significant longitudinal change.These exploratory findings suggest that RV systolic indices should not be interpreted in isolation as markers of functional limitation during the late post-COVID-19 period and support the use of an integrated, multiparametric approach to patient assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rogelin et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Post-COVID-19 (n=49). Time since acute COVID-19 infection vs. 4 months post-infection (AV1) was evaluated on Change in right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS) (MD -0.99, 95% CI -2.53 to 0.56, p=0.21). In post-COVID-19 survivors, functional capacity and pulmonary diffusing capacity improved over 13 months, whereas right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain remained persistently reduced without significant longitudinal change (MD -0.99%, p=0.21).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: