SUMMARY Two Brazilian wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum L., varieties IAC‐5 and Jupateco) were grown in solution culture with three concentrations of P (1, 5 and 20 μg ml‐1) and no Al, then transferred to three concentrations of Al (0, 2.5 and 12.5 μg ml‐1) and no P and afterwards returned to the first solutions. In the first growth period the tolerant variety IAC‐5 absorbed and translocated more P to the shoots than the sensitive one. In the second period A1 restricted both root growth and the translocation of P from root to shoot, and led to movement of P from shoots to roots in plants with low P contents, the sensitive variety again being most affected. The amount of P translocated to the roots was approximately equal to the increase in isotopically‐exchangeable P in the roots. In the third period, root P taken up in the first period was translocated to the shoots in amounts approximately equal to the total exchangeable P in the roots, along with freshly absorbed P. After the second period tissue was ground and filtered to give a filtrate (predominantly cell contents) and a residue (predominantly cell walls). The A1: P ratio (μmol g‐1 dry matter) in the contents was about 1:7, and in the walls it was 1:2. The latter value may indicate the composition of aluminium phosphate precipitated in the walls. Tolerance of soil acidity is associated with the ability of roots to translocate P to shoots in the presence of A1 and may also depend on the ability to move P down to roots growing in acid subsoils.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miranda et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: