Key result
Low income and stressful work are linked to ~28% higher non-fatal CVD risk.
Why the study?
It is unclear if the effect of stressful work on cardiovascular disease varies by socioeconomic position.
Does disadvantaged socioeconomic position modify the effect of stressful work on incident non-fatal cardiovascular disease in employed adults?
Cohort (n=48,383)
Does disadvantaged socioeconomic position modify the effect of stressful work on incident non-fatal cardiovascular disease in employed adults?
Disadvantaged socioeconomic position and stressful work independently increase the risk of non-fatal cardiovascular disease, but there is no clear evidence that socioeconomic position modifies the effect of work stress.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low income and work stress were independently associated with higher non-fatal CVD risk; leaves open whether socioeconomic position modifies work stress effects.
BACKGROUND: Studies show that a disadvantaged socioeconomic position (SEP) and psychosocial stress at work are both independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). But it is not clear if the effect of stress at work on CVD varies by SEP. METHODS: We used baseline and follow-up data from the French population-based cohort study CONSTANCES, including 48 383 employed women and men aged 30-70 years. Three SEP indicators (education, income, occupation), stressful psychosocial work as measured by effort-reward imbalance, pre-existing CVD and confounders were assessed at baseline, and incident non-fatal CVD events reported during annual follow-up (up to five follow-ups) were used as outcomes. The effect modification hypothesis was both investigated on an additive and multiplicative scale. RESULTS: SEP was inversely associated with CVD risk (eg, for low vs high income, OR 1.28 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.46)), and for all three components of stressful work CVD risks were significantly increased (eg, for effort-reward ratio OR 1.26 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.36)). Employees with a disadvantaged SEP showed moderately increased effect sizes of stressful work on CVD. However, no clear evidence of an effect modification was found. CONCLUSIONS: Disadvantaged SEP and stressful work contribute to higher CVD risk in this cohort. Despite moderately increased effect sizes for disadvantaged SEP groups, no evidence was found to support an effect modification hypothesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siegrist et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in non-fatal cardiovascular disease (n=48,383). Disadvantaged socioeconomic position and stressful work vs. Advantaged socioeconomic position and non-stressful work was evaluated on incident non-fatal CVD events (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.46). Low income and stressful work were independently associated with increased risks of incident non-fatal CVD (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.12-1.46 and OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.17-1.36, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: