Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The well-recorded aftershocks and well-determined source model of the Noto Hanto earthquake provide an excellent opportunity to examine earthquake triggering associated with a blind thrust event. The aftershock zone rapidly expanded into a ‘butterfly pattern’ predicted by static Coulomb stress transfer associated with thrust faulting. We found that abundant aftershocks occurred where the static Coulomb stress increased by more than 0.5 bars, while few shocks occurred in the stress shadow calculated to extend northwest and southeast of the Noto Hanto rupture. To explore the three-dimensional distribution of the observed aftershocks and the calculated stress imparted by the mainshock, we further resolved Coulomb stress changes on the nodal planes of all aftershocks for which focal mechanisms are available. About 75% of the possible faults associated with the moderate-sized aftershocks were calculated to have been brought closer to failure by the mainshock, with the correlation best for low apparent fault friction. Our interpretation is that most of the aftershocks struck on the steeply dipping source fault and on a conjugate northwest-dipping reverse fault contiguous with the source fault. Since we found that the Coulomb hypothesis works well for the Noto Hanto sequence, we subsequently computed stress changes on the nearby active faults. Although the calculated stress changes were found to be negligible on the major faults south of the Noto Peninsula, several short active faults near the epicentral area were calculated to have been brought several bars closer to failure. Thus, the probability of strong shaking in and around the epicentral area may still be high due to the transfer of stress to the adjacent faults by a short blind thrust fault.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shinji Toda (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: