Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Density functional calculations have been performed on M2X6 complexes (where M = U, W, and Mo and X = Cl, F, OH, NH2, and CH3) to investigate general aspects of their electronic structures and explore the similarities and differences in metal-metal bonding between f-block and d-block elements. A detailed analysis of the metal-metal interactions has been conducted using molecular orbital theory and energy decomposition methods. Multiple (sigma and pi) bonding is predicted for all species investigated, with predominant f-f and d-d metal orbital character, respectively, for U and W or Mo complexes. The energy decomposition analysis involves contributions from orbital interactions (mixing of occupied and unoccupied orbitals), electrostatic effects (Coulombic attraction and repulsion), and Pauli repulsion (associated with four-electron two-orbital interactions). The general results suggest that the overall metal-metal interaction is stronger in the Mo and W species, relative to the U analogues, as a consequence of a significantly less destabilizing contribution from the combined Pauli and electrostatic ("pre-relaxation") effects. Although the orbital-mixing ("post-relaxation") contribution to the total bonding energy is predicted to have a larger magnitude in the U complexes, this is not sufficiently strong to compensate for the comparatively greater destabilization that originates from the Pauli-plus-electrostatic effects. Of the pre-relaxation terms, the Pauli repulsion is comparable in analogous U and d-block compounds, contrary to the electrostatic term, which is (much) less favorable in the U systems than in the W and Mo systems. This generally weak electrostatic stabilization accounts for the large pre-relaxation destabilization in the U complexes and, ultimately, for the relative weakness of the U-U bonds. The origin of the small electrostatic term in the U compounds is traced primarily to MX(3) fragment overlap effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cavigliasso et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: