Animal and human studies have indicated that developing mammals fed only alpha-linolenic acid (18:3n-3) have lower docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3) content in brain and tissue phospholipids when compared with mammals fed 18:3n-3 plus 22:6n-3. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that low bioavailability of dietary 18:3n-3 to be converted to 22:6n-3 could partly explain this difference in fatty acid accretion. For that purpose, we determined the partitioning of dietary 18:3n-3 and 22:6n-3 between total n-3 fatty acid body accumulation, excretion, and disappearance (difference between the intake and the sum of total n-3 fatty acids accumulated and excreted). This was assessed using the quantitative method of whole-body fatty acid balance in growing rats fed the same amount of a 5% fat diet supplying either 18:3n-3 or 22:6n-3 at a level of 0.45% of dietary energy (i.e., 200 mg/100 g diet). We found that 58.9% of the total amount of 18:3n-3 ingested disappeared, 0.4% was excreted in feces, 21.2% accumulated as 18:3n-3 (50% in total fats and 46% in the carcass-skin compartment), and 17.2% accumulated as long-chain derivatives (14% as 22:6n-3 and 3.2% as 20:5n-3 + 22:5n-3). Similar results were obtained from the docosahexaenoate balance (as % of the total amount ingested): disappearance, 64.5%; excretion, 0.5%; total accumulation, 35% with 30.1% as 22:6n-3. Thus, rats fed docosahexaenoate accumulated a twofold higher amount of 22:6n-3, which was mainly deposited in the carcass-skin compartment (68%). Similar proportions of disappearance of dietary 18:3n-3 and 22:6n-3 lead us to speculate that these two n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids were beta-oxidized in the same amount.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poumès‐Ballihaut et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: