Systematic review finds initiating ARBs does not reduce mortality or disease severity in adults with COVID-19, indicating no therapeutic benefit.
LettersMay 2023Update Alert 10: Risks and Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers on SARS-CoV-2 Infection in AdultsFREEKatherine Mackey, MD, MPP, Devan Kansagara, MD, MCR, Kathryn Vela, MLIS, AHIPKatherine Mackey, MD, MPPSearch for more papers by this author, Devan Kansagara, MD, MCRSearch for more papers by this author, Kathryn Vela, MLIS, AHIPVA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OregonSearch for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/L23-0049 SectionsSupplemental MaterialAboutVisual AbstractPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail This living systematic review has addressed 3 key questions about COVID-19 and the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs): whether these medications increase susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2, increase the likelihood of worse outcomes, and paradoxically, whether they have protective effects and could be used as COVID-19 treatment (1). In previous update alerts, we summarized high-strength evidence that antecedent use of ACEIs and ARBs is not associated with increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe disease and retired these key questions. In this final update alert, we summarize current evidence about our third key question: the benefits and harms of initiating ACEIs or ARBs in adults with COVID-19 who were not previously receiving these medications.In an updated literature search from 22 November 2021 to 19 December 2022 using the same search strategy as our original review, we identified 285 potentially relevant articles and included 3 additional randomized controlled trials with published results (Supplement Table 1), adding to 4 previously included trials (2–8). We used the same methods for study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and evidence synthesis as we described in our original review.In Update Alert 9, we discussed 3 small trials of ARB initiation among adults hospitalized with COVID-19 (5–7, 9). Because of study methodological concerns, inconsistency, and imprecision, we concluded that the evidence was insufficient to draw conclusions about benefits and harms. Similarly, we identified only 1 study of losartan initiation in the outpatient setting among adults with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, which did not find a benefit in terms of hospitalization risk (8). We also concluded that this evidence was insufficient.The addition of 3 new trials (all rated low risk of bias) (Supplement Table 2) in this update alert increases the total number of participants across studies from 386 to 1392. None of the 3 new trials found ARB initiation to be beneficial. In the largest trial to date, which was done primarily in India but also included a few participants in Australia, a total of 787 adults (71% hospitalized) were randomly assigned to receive telmisartan at a starting dose of 40 mg daily versus placebo (in India) or an ARB at the discretion of the treating team versus usual care (in Australia) (2). Deaths were relatively rare (16 participants overall), and mortality was similar between groups (odds ratio, 1.74 [95% credible interval, 0.62 to 5.25]). Disease severity as measured by the World Health Organization Clinical Progression Scale, the study’s primary outcome, was worse in the intervention group at day 14 but similar in both groups by day 28. Another new trial of 205 adults hospitalized with COVID-19 in the United States compared use of 50 mg of losartan twice daily to placebo for 10 days or until hospital discharge and did not find a difference between groups in 28-day mortality rates (11% in the intervention group compared with 9% in the control group) or the primary outcome—the ratio of arterial Pao2 to Fio2 (3). The third new trial of 14 hospitalized adults compared 25 mg of losartan twice daily to placebo (3 participants) or 400 mg of lopinavir–100 mg of ritonavir twice daily (2 participants) for 5 to14 days and did not identify a difference in COVID-19 mortality or disease severity (4).Among all 7 included trials (3 new trials and 4 included in Update Alert 9), 2 identified numerically higher rates of adverse events in the ARB intervention groups compared with the comparator groups (3–4). Adverse events included acute kidney injury, hypotension, and hyperkalemia, as well as cardiovascular and respiratory serious adverse events. The remaining 5 trials did not identify any difference in adverse events between groups.In summary, on the basis of moderate-strength evidence, ARB initiation among adults with COVID-19 probably does not have a mortality benefit. Although the specific interventions varied (use of different ARBs and varying doses), results were consistent across 6 of the 7 trials with no serious methodological concerns (Supplement Table 3). Event rates (deaths) were low across studies, making results imprecise. A recent meta-analysis of trials of ACEIs and ARBs continuation as well as initiation among adults with COVID-19 also found no difference in all-cause mortality. This meta-analysis included 5 of the same trials included in our review, as well as results from 3 unpublished trials (10).In addition, on the basis of moderate-strength evidence from 3 trials (including 1 trial that evaluated the need for intensive care, which could be considered a surrogate for disease severity), ARB initiation probably does not change COVID-19 severity. Other outcomes varied among studies, precluding additional conclusions. However, we note that none of the trials identified a statistically significant benefit for any outcome except for 1 trial of telmisartan initiation among hospitalized adults (5). However, as discussed in our previous update alert, we have methodological concerns about this trial (rated high risk of bias) because of differences between groups at baseline, changes in study end points, and some secondary outcomes during the study period.Trials included participants with a mix of disease severity and generally did not stratify results, which is a limitation of the current evidence. Most trials were also completed within the first year of the pandemic, and the most recent trial was completed by the end of 2021. Because of the introduction of vaccines, presence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants, and changes in COVID-19 management over time, results may have limited applicability to adults diagnosed with COVID-19 now and in the future. Many clinical trials on ACEI or ARB treatment of COVID-19 were launched in 2020. Several of these trials were terminated early because of low enrollment, whereas others lack a recent status update on ClinicalTrials.gov (11–17). An updated list of active trials is presented in Supplement Table 4 (18, 19).References1. Mackey K, King VJ, Gurley S, et al.. Risks and impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers on SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults. A living systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173:195-203. [PMID: 32422062] doi:10.7326/M20-1515 LinkGoogle Scholar2. Jardine MJ, Kotwal SS, Bassi A, et al; CLARITY trial investigators. Angiotensin receptor blockers for the treatment of Covid-19: pragmatic, adaptive, multicentre, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2022;379:e072175. [PMID: 36384746] doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-072175 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Puskarich MA, Ingraham NE, Merck LH, et al; Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Based Lung Protective Strategies for Inpatients With COVID-19 (ALPS-IP) Investigators. Efficacy of losartan in hospitalized patients with COVID-19-induced lung injury: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e222735. [PMID: 35294537] doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2735 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Freilich D, Victory J, Jenkins P, et al.. COVIDMED - an early pandemic randomized clinical trial of losartan treatment for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022;29:100968. [PMID: 35874909] doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100968 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Duarte M, Pelorosso F, Nicolosi LN, et al.. Telmisartan for treatment of Covid-19 patients: an open multicenter randomized clinical trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;37:100962. [PMID: 34189447] doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100962 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Geriak M, et al. Randomized prospective open label study shows no impact on clinical outcome of adding losartan to hospitalized COVID-19 patients with mild hypoxemia. Infectious Diseases & Therapy. 2021;11:11. Google Scholar7. Nouri-Vaskeh M, Kalami N, Zand R, et al.. Comparison of losartan and amlodipine effects on the outcomes of patient with COVID-19 and primary hypertension: a randomised clinical trial. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75:e14124. [PMID: 33650197] doi:10.1111/ijcp.14124 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Puskarich MA, Cummins NW, Ingraham NE, et al.. A multi-center phase II randomized clinical trial of losartan on symptomatic outpatients with COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;37:100957. [PMID: 34195577] doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100957 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Mackey K, Kansagara D, Vela K. Update alert 9: risks and impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers on SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults. Ann Intern Med. 2022;175:W47-W48. [PMID: 35130048] doi:10.7326/L21-0791 LinkGoogle Scholar10. Gnanenthiran SR, Borghi C, Burger D, et al; COVID‐METARASI Consortium. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials led by the international society of hypertension. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:e026143. [PMID: 36000426] doi:10.1161/JAHA.122.026143 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11. Pilot Clinical Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Telmisartan for the Mitigation of Pulmonary and Cardiac Complications in COVID-19 Patients [clinical trial]. Accessed at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04360551 on 2 February 2023. Google Scholar12. COVID MED Trial - Comparison of Therapeutics for Hospitalized Patients Infected With COVID-19 (COVIDMED) [clinical trial]. Accessed at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04328012 on 2 February 2023. Google Scholar13. INvestigating TELmisartin Study (INTEL) [clinical trial]. Accessed at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04715763 on 2 February 2023. Google Scholar14. Efficacy of Captopril Nebulization in Covid-19 Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) CoV-2 Pneumonia. (CAPTOCOVID) [clinical trial]. Accessed at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04355429 on 2 February 2023. Google Scholar15. Telmisartan in Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19 (STAR-COVID) [clinical trial]. Accessed at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04510662 on 2 February 2023. Google Scholar16. Host Response Mediators in Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection - Is There a Protective Effect of Losartan and Other ARBs on Outcomes of Coronavirus Infection? (ARBs CORONA II) [clinical trial]. Accessed at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04606563 on 2 February 2023. Google Scholar17. Ramipril for the Treatment of COVID-19 (RAMIC) [clinical trial]. Accessed at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04366050 on 2 February 2023. Google Scholar18. The COVID-RASi Trial (COVID-19) [clinical trial]. Accessed at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04591210 on 22 February 2023. Google Scholar19. Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Treatment of Covid 19 [clinical trial]. Accessed at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04345406 on 2 February 2023. Google Scholar Comments0 CommentsSign In to Submit A Comment Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: Katherine Mackey, MD, MPP; Devan Kansagara, MD, MCR; Kathryn Vela, MLIS, AHIPAffiliations: VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OregonDisclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. government.Disclosures: Authors have reported no disclosures of interest. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=L23-0049.Corresponding Author: Katherine Mackey, MD, MPP, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, Portland, OR 97239; e-mail, Katherine.[email protected]gov.This article was published at Annals.org on 21 March 2023. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoUpdate Alert: Risks and Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers on SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Adults Devan Kansagara , Katherine Mackey , and Kathryn Vela Risks and Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers on SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Adults Katherine Mackey , Valerie J. King , Susan Gurley , Michael Kiefer , Erik Liederbauer , Kathryn Vela , Payten Sonnen , and Devan Kansagara Update Alert 2: Risks and Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers on SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Adults Katherine Mackey , Devan Kansagara , and Kathryn Vela Update Alert 3: Risks and Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers on SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Adults Katherine Mackey , Devan Kansagara , and Kathryn Vela Update Alert 4: Risks and Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers on SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Adults Katherine Mackey , Devan Kansagara , and Kathryn Vela Update Alert 7: Risks and Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers on SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Adults Katherine Mackey , Devan Kansagara , and Kathryn Vela Update Alert 8: Risks and Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers on SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Adults Katherine Mackey , Devan Kansagara , and Kathryn Vela Update Alert 9: Risks and Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers on SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Adults Katherine Mackey , Devan Kansagara , Kathryn Vela Metrics Current IssueMay 2023Volume 176, Issue 5KeywordsAngiotensin converting enzymeAngiotensin converting enzyme inhibitorAngiotensin receptor blockerCOVID-19Cohort studiesIntensive care unitsObservational studiesSystematic reviews ePublished: 21 March 2023 Issue Published: May 2023 PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mackey et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: