Key result
Intravenous methylnaltrexone fails to reduce high on-treatment platelet reactivity compared to placebo.
Why the study?
Morphine administration delays the onset of action of orally administered ticagrelor in STEMI patients, likely due to impaired gastrointestinal motility, and it is unknown if methylnaltrexone can improve this.
Does intravenous methylnaltrexone improve platelet reactivity and plasma concentrations of orally administered ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction receiving morphine?
RCT (n=82)
Blinded
Randomized
Yes
Does intravenous methylnaltrexone improve platelet reactivity and plasma concentrations of orally administered ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction receiving morphine?
Intravenous methylnaltrexone does not improve the delayed onset of action of orally administered ticagrelor in STEMI patients receiving morphine.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Methylnaltrexone does not improve ticagrelor pharmacodynamics in morphine-treated STEMI; leaves open need for alternative strategies to accelerate P2Y12 inhibition.
Background Morphine administration is a strong predictor of delayed onset of action of orally administered ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, likely because of impaired gastrointestinal motility. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the peripheral opioid antagonist methylnaltrexone could improve pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of orally administered ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction receiving morphine. Methods and Results The MOVEMENT (Methylnaltrexone to Improve Platelet Inhibition of Ticagrelor in Morphine-Treated Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trial was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with morphine and ticagrelor. Upon arrival to the catheterization laboratory, patients were randomized to a blinded intravenous injection of either methylnaltrexone (8 or 12 mg according to weight) or 0.9% sodium chloride. The proportion of patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity and plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and AR -C124910XX were assessed at baseline (arrival in the catheterization laboratory) and 1 and 2 hours later. A total of 82 patients received either methylnaltrexone (n=43) or placebo (n=39). Median (interquartile range) time from ticagrelor administration to randomization was 41 (31-50) versus 45.5 (37-60) minutes ( P=0.16). Intravenous methylnaltrexone administration did not significantly affect prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity at 2 hours after inclusion, the primary end point, when compared with placebo (54% versus 51%, P=0.84). Plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and its active metabolite, the prespecified secondary end points, did not differ significantly between the groups over time. There was no significant difference in patient self-estimated pain between the groups. Conclusions Methylnaltrexone did not significantly improve platelet reactivity or plasma concentrations of orally administered ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction receiving morphine. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 02942550.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holm et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (n=82). Methylnaltrexone vs. 0.9% sodium chloride (placebo) was evaluated on Prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity at 2 hours after inclusion (p=0.84). Intravenous methylnaltrexone did not significantly affect the prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity at 2 hours compared with placebo (54% vs 51%, P=0.84).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: