This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
INTRODUCTION: Third-generation EGFR- tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard first-line therapy for EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. Prospective data on toxicity-driven switching to alternative third-generation TKIs for intolerant patients remain limited. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial (NCT04882345), patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC who developed grade 2 or higher hematologic toxicities or increase in alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST), or grade 3 or higher nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) (excluding ALT or AST increase) on osimertinib received aumolertinib 110 mg once daily after AEs recovered to grade 1 or lower. The primary end point was the 3-month conversion success rate (absence of disease progression, grade ≥2 hematologic AEs or increase in ALT or AST, and grade ≥3 nonhematologic AEs). RESULTS: Of the 40 enrolled patients, 39 received aumolertinib, and 34 were evaluable for the primary end point. The 3-month conversion success rate was 70.6% (95% confidence interval: 52.5-84.9) in the evaluable population, with 78.9% in nonhematologic toxicity and 60.0% in hematologic toxicity subgroups. Median postswitch progression-free survival was 11.6 months, and the 3-year postswitch overall survival rate was 52.4%. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 69.2% of patients (grade ≥3: 15.4%), with no aumolertinib discontinuation or death. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective trial suggests that switching to aumolertinib achieves sustained efficacy and manageable safety in osimertinib-intolerant EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC, supporting toxicity-driven EGFR-TKI switching as a feasible clinical strategy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: