Key result
Immune checkpoint inhibitors yield an ~11% response in cardiac sarcomas, with longer survival in nonangiosarcomas.
Why the study?
Primary cardiac soft tissue sarcomas affect young adults and have dismal outcomes, but clinical outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors are not well characterized.
What are the clinical outcomes of patients with primary cardiac soft tissue sarcomas receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors?
Cohort (n=24)
Yes
What are the clinical outcomes of patients with primary cardiac soft tissue sarcomas receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors?
Immune checkpoint inhibitors show modest activity in primary cardiac soft tissue sarcomas, with durable benefits seen in nonangiosarcoma subtypes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice in cardiac sarcomas; hypothesis-generating for nonangiosarcoma-specific benefit and requires prospective validation.
Primary cardiac soft tissue sarcomas (CSTS) affect young adults, with dismal outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with CSTS receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). A retrospective, multi-institutional cohort study was conducted among patients with CSTS between 2015 and 2022. The patients were treated with ICI-based regimens. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Objective response rates were determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Treatment-related adverse events were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Among 24 patients with CSTS, 17 (70.8%) were White, and 13 (54.2%) were male. Eight patients (33.3%) had angiosarcoma. At the time of ICI treatment, 18 patients (75.0%) had metastatic CSTS, and 4 (16.7%) had locally advanced disease. ICIs were administered as the first-line therapy in 6 patients (25.0%) and as the second-line therapy or beyond in 18 patients (75.0%). For the 18 patients with available response data, objective response rate was 11.1% (n = 2 of 18). The median PFS and median OS in advanced and metastatic CSTS (n = 22) were 5.7 months (95% CI: 2.8-13.3 months) and 14.9 months (95% CI: 5.7-23.7 months), respectively. The median PFS and OS were significantly shorter in patients with cardiac angiosarcomas than in those with nonangiosarcoma CSTS: median PFS was 1.7 vs 11 months, respectively (P < 0.0001), and median OS was 3.0 vs 24.0 months, respectively (P = 0.008). Any grade treatment-related adverse events occurred exclusively in the 15 patients with nonangiosarcoma CSTS (n = 7 [46.7%]), of which 6 (40.0%) were grade ≥3. Although ICIs demonstrate modest activity in CSTS, durable benefit was observed in a subset of patients with nonangiosarcoma, albeit with higher toxicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nassar et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Primary cardiac soft tissue sarcomas (CSTS) (n=24). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was evaluated on Median overall survival in advanced and metastatic CSTS (95% CI 5.7-23.7). Immune checkpoint inhibitors for cardiac soft tissue sarcomas yielded an 11.1% objective response rate, with longer median survival in nonangiosarcoma vs angiosarcoma (24.0 vs 3.0 months; P=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: