This study aimed to develop a scale for Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Physical Education (SRLS-PE) for junior high school students based on three cyclical selfregulatory phases.In Survey 1, 398 junior high school students completed open-ended responses on self-regulated learning strategies across three phases: forethought, performance control, and self-reflection.The responses yielded three categories for forethought: six for performance control and two for self-reflection.In Survey 2, 867 students completed the Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Physical Education (SRLS-PE), attitudes toward physical education, and goal orientation.Additionally, 55 of these students participated in a retest to assess the test-retest reliability.Factor analysis revealed two factors (goal-setting and motivational regulation) for forethought, three factors (trial and error, imitation, and cooperation) for performance control, and one factor (self-reflection) for self-reflection.The reliability of the self-regulated learning strategies was further examined using Cronbach's alpha and one-month retest correlations, both of which demonstrated satisfactory values.Correlation coefficients with attitudes toward physical education were calculated and showed moderate correlations to assess the validity of the self-regulated learning strategies.Goal orientation's influence on self-regulated learning strategies was examined, revealing that task orientation exhibited a greater significantly positive effect on self-regulated learning strategies, compared with ego orientation.Furthermore, female students scored significantly higher-compared with their male counterparts-on self-regulated learning involving imitation, cooperation, and self-reflection.These findings suggest that the self-regulated learning strategies have certain validity levels.Challenges and future directions of these scales are discussed.早期公開
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Susaki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: