Key result
A novel method fusing driver EEG signals with surrounding information detected emergency situations with a system accuracy of 94.89%, false alarm rate of 0.05%, and response time of 540 ms.
A novel EEG-based emergency detection system for brain-controlled vehicles demonstrated high accuracy and fast response times in a hardware-in-the-loop experiment.
May improve safety in brain-controlled vehicles; extends EEG applications but remains hypothesis-generating.
In this paper, to address the safety of brain-controlled vehicles under emergency situations, we propose a novel method of emergency situation detection by fusing driver electroencephalography (EEG) signals with surrounding information. We first build a novel EEG-based detection model of driver emergency braking intention. We then recognize emergency situations by fusing the result of the proposed EEG-based intention detection model with that of the obstacle detection model based on surrounding information. The real-time detection system of driver emergency braking intention is implemented on an embedded system, and the driver-and-hardware-in-the-loop-experiment of the proposed detection method of emergency situations is performed. Experimental results show that the proposed method can detect emergency situations with the system accuracy of 94.89%, false alarm rate of 0.05%, and response time of 540 ms. This paper has important values in the future development of brain-controlled vehicles, human-centric advanced driver assistant systems, and self-driving vehicles and opens a new avenue on how cognitive neuroscience may be applied to human-machine integration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bi et al. (2018) studied this question. Fusing driver EEG signals with surrounding information was evaluated on System accuracy, false alarm rate, and response time. A novel method fusing driver EEG signals with surrounding information detected emergency situations with a system accuracy of 94.89%, false alarm rate of 0.05%, and response time of 540 ms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: