Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine if electrical stimulation (ES) benefits (waking time, 3-month outcomes) treated coma patients. RESEARCH DESIGN: Double blind randomized-controlled study. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Ten coma patients; six treatment and four controls, using the 'Respond Select' by EMPI. EXPERIMENTAL INTERVENTIONS: Treatment group received radial nerve ES applied in 300 ms intermittent pulses at 40 Hz, 15-20m A 8 hours a day up to 14 days of coma; control group received sham stimulation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: ES group emerged from coma mean 2 days earlier than controls, although this result was not statistically significant. At 3 months post-injury, there was no group difference in Glasgow Outcome Scale, although the ES group had improved function over controls as measured by the FIM/FAM (mean of 114 and 64.5, respectively, n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: These data show an interesting trend, although statistical power was limited in this small pilot study, suggesting the need for a larger trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peri et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: