Key result
Delphi-based consensus establishes 40 quality indicators for evaluating CCU care.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular diseases cause high mortality and morbidity, and appropriate indicators to evaluate service quality in CCUs in Iran were lacking.
A set of 40 quality indicators was developed to evaluate and improve the service quality for cardiovascular patients admitted to CCUs in Iran.
May guide CCU quality assessment in Iran; validation studies needed before clinical adoption.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases are among the most prevalent chronic diseases leading to high degrees of mortality and morbidity worldwide and in Iran. The aim of the current study was to determine and develop appropriate indicators for evaluating provided service quality for cardiovascular patients admitted to Cardiac Care Units (CCU) in Iran. METHODS: In order to determine the indicators for evaluating provided service quality, a four-stage process including reviewing systematic review articles in premier bibliographic databases, interview, performing two rounds of Delphi technique, and holding experts panel by attendance of experts in different fields was adopted. Finally, after recognizing relevant indicators in resources, these indicators were finalized during various stages using ideas of 27 experts in different fields. RESULTS: Among 2800 found articles in the text reviewing phase, 21 articles, which had completely mentioned relevant indicators, were studied and 48 related indicators were extracted. After two interviews with a cardiologist and an epidemiologist, 32 items of the indicators were omitted and replaced by 27 indicators coping with the conditions of Iranian hospitals. Finally, 43 indicators were added into the Delphi phase and after 2 rounds of Delphi with 18 specialists, 7 cases were excluded due to their low scores of applicability. In the experts' panel stage, 6 items were also omitted and 10 new indicators were developed to replace them. Eventually, 40 indicators were finalized. CONCLUSION: In this study, some proper indicators for evaluating provided service quality for CCU admissions in Iran were determined. Considering the informative richness of these indicators, they can be used by managers, policy makers, health service providers, and also insurance agencies in order to improve the quality of services, decisions, and policies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aghdash et al. (2013) studied Cardiovascular diseases (CCU admissions) (n=27). Development of service quality indicators was evaluated on Finalized indicators for evaluating provided service quality. A four-stage process involving literature review, interviews, and Delphi panels with 27 experts resulted in the finalization of 40 appropriate indicators for evaluating CCU service quality in Iran.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: