Key result
Diabetes does not impair the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for CAD.
Why the study?
The impact of diabetes mellitus on the accuracy of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy using CZT detectors and the influence of stress modality on diagnostic performance were unclear.
Does the choice of stress modality (exercise vs. vasodilator) affect the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with diabetes mellitus?
Case-Control (n=648)
Does the choice of stress modality (exercise vs. vasodilator) affect the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with diabetes mellitus?
In patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, vasodilator stress yields higher diagnostic accuracy than exercise stress due to impaired exercise capacity reducing specificity.
Exercise stress CZT-MPS may lower specificity in DM; leaves open optimal stress selection pending randomized trials.
Aims: To evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the accuracy of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods and results: Two hundred and sixteen patients with DM and 432 matched controls were submitted to MPS on a dedicated cardiac camera equipped with cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) detectors and coronary angiography. Exercise stress was performed in 442 (68%) patients, while the remainders underwent vasodilator stress. Exercise level was determined as the percentage of the predicted maximal workload that was attained (%Wattmax). The summed difference score was derived from CZT images. A coronary stenosis >70% was considered obstructive. The prevalence of obstructive CAD was 59.7% in patients with DM and 56.2% in controls (P = NS). The accuracy of MPS in detecting CAD was similar in patients with and without DM [area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.77 vs. 0.78, P = NS]. An interaction between the accuracy of MPS and cardiac stress-protocol was revealed. In fact, in patients with DM exercise stress CZT had a lower accuracy than vasodilator-stress (AUC 0.70 vs. 0.89, P < 0.001), because of a lower specificity (45% vs. 69%), while in the control group the accuracy of MPS was similar regardless of the stress-protocol adopted. Patients with DM attained a significantly lower %Wattmax during exercise than controls (76 ± 27% vs. 82 ± 26%, P = 0.038), which resulted an independent predictor of reduced specificity (P = 0.026). Conclusion: The accuracy of CZT imaging in patients with DM is elevated, and it is quite comparable to the one obtained in patients without DM. However, a reduced specificity can be expected in the case of exercise stress CZT, because of an impaired exercise capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gimelli et al. (2017) conducted a case-control in Coronary artery disease (n=648). Diabetes mellitus vs. Matched controls without diabetes mellitus was evaluated on Accuracy of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in detecting CAD (AUC) (p=NS). Diabetes mellitus did not significantly affect the overall accuracy of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for detecting coronary artery disease compared to controls (AUC 0.77 vs. 0.78, P = NS).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: