Key result
Modeling residual strains and composite wall structure accurately predicts intact heart wall biaxial mechanics.
Why the study?
Accurate prediction of the mechanical behavior of the intact heart wall requires accounting for residual strains and the composite nature of myocardium and epicardium.
Accurate prediction of intact heart wall mechanical behavior requires accounting for residual strains and the composite nature of the epicardium and myocardium.
We studied 19 excised, passive rabbit left ventricular walls to delineate the forms of the strain-energy functions (W) for myocardium and epicardium, to quantify residual strains across the wall, and to investigate whether the mechanical behavior of the intact wall can be predicted by accounting for the above properties. The unloaded dimensions and the stress-strain responses to equibiaxial and uniaxial loadings were obtained first for the intact wall and then individually for the epicardium and myocardium. Results show that the previously proposed W for canine myocardium and epicardium are suitable. The unloaded intact wall has residual strains: the epicardium is stretched and the myocardium shrunk from their respective isolated, unloaded states. The predicted mechanical responses of the intact wall to biaxial loadings were inaccurate when the residual strains were not taken into account. Accounting for these, however, yielded reasonable predictions. Thus information on the unloaded reference state and properties of each portion is needed to accurately predict the behavior of the intact wall.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (1996) studied this question. Accounting for residual strains and composite nature of heart wall vs. Not accounting for residual strains was evaluated on Predicted mechanical responses of the intact wall to biaxial loadings. Accounting for residual strains and the composite nature of the heart wall yielded reasonable predictions of the mechanical responses of the intact wall to biaxial loadings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: