XAI requires artificial intelligence systems to provide explanations for their decisions and actions for review. Nevertheless, for big data systems where decisions are made frequently, it is technically impossible to have an expert monitor every decision. To solve this problem, the authors propose an explainability auditing method for image recognition whether the explanations are relevant for the decision made by a black box model, and involve an expert as needed when explanations are doubtful. The explainability auditing system classifies explanations as weak or satisfactory using a local explainability model by analyzing the image segments that impacted the decision. This version of the proposed method uses LIME to generate the local explanations as superpixels. Then a bag of image patches is extracted from the superpixels to determine their texture and evaluate the local explanations. Using a rooftop image dataset, the authors show that 95.7% of the cases to be audited can be detected by the proposed method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Don et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: