Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Numerical modelers of high-velocity channels are faced with supercritical transitions and the difficulty in capturing discontinuities in the flow field, known as hydraulic jumps. The implied smoothness of a numerical scheme can produce fictitious oscillations near these jump locations and can lead to instability. It is also important that the discrete numerical operations preserve the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions and accurately model jump speed and location. The geometric complexity of high-velocity channels with bridge piers and service ramps are easily represented using an unstructured model. A two-dimensional finite-element model that utilizes a characteristic based Petrov-Galerkin method and a shock-detection mechanism, which relies on elemental energy variation results in a robust system to model high-velocity channels. Comparisons are made between analytic shock-speed results, published laboratory data of a lateral contraction, and with a more general physical model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berger et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: