Key result
The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a reduction in elective bariatric surgery volume from 8,615 to 2,930 cases, with no significant change in surgical complication rates (1.4% vs 2.0%; P=0.13).
Why the study?
Did the COVID-19 pandemic affect the volume, case mix, and outcomes of elective bariatric surgery in the UK?
Cohort (n=11,545)
Yes
Did the COVID-19 pandemic affect the volume, case mix, and outcomes of elective bariatric surgery in the UK?
Relative Risk: 0.71 (95% CI 0.45–1.12)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.4% vs 2%
p-value: p=0.13
Despite guidelines recommending prioritization of patients with severe co-morbidities during the pandemic, the case mix of bariatric surgery patients remained unchanged while overall volume dropped significantly.
Volume reductions in elective bariatric surgery during COVID showed no complication increase; leaves open effects on long-term obesity outcomes and triage criteria.
Background When surgery resumed following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, guidelines recommended the prioritization of patients with greater obesity-related co-morbidities and/or higher body mass index. Objective The aim of this study was to record the effect of the pandemic on total number, patient demographics, and perioperative outcomes of elective bariatric surgery patients in the United Kingdom. Setting and Methods The United Kingdom National Bariatric Surgical Registry was used to identify patients who underwent elective bariatric surgery during the pandemic (1 yr from April 1, 2020). Characteristics of this group were compared with those of a pre-pandemic cohort. Primary outcomes were case volume, case mix, and providers. National Health Service cases were analyzed for baseline health status and perioperative outcomes. Fisher exact, χ 2 , and Student t tests were used as appropriate. Results The total number of cases decreased to one third of pre-pandemic volume (8615 to 2930). The decrease in operating volume varied, with 36 hospitals (45%) experiencing a 75%–100% reduction. Cases performed in the National Health Service fell from 74% to 53% ( P < .0001). There was no change in baseline body mass index (45.2 ± 8.3 kg/m 2 from 45.5 ± 8.3 kg/m 2 ; P = .23) or prevalence of type 2 diabetes (26% from 26%; P = .99). Length of stay (median 2 d) and surgical complication rate (1.4% from 2.0%; relative risk=.71; 95% CI .45–1.12; P = .13) were unchanged. Conclusions In the context of a dramatic reduction in elective bariatric surgery due to the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with more severe co-morbidities were not prioritized for surgery. These findings should inform preparation for future crises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGlone et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in elective bariatric surgery (n=11,545). COVID-19 pandemic vs. Pre-pandemic period was evaluated on surgical complication rate (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.45-1.12, p=0.13). The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a reduction in elective bariatric surgery volume from 8,615 to 2,930 cases, with no significant change in surgical complication rates (1.4% vs 2.0%; P=0.13).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: