• One-step visible-light photocatalysis achieves rapid NCS degradation. • Process avoids catalyst poisoning by eliminating dark adsorption stage. • LDH/MOF@HC nanohybrid shows high stability and minimal metal leaching. • Catalyst maintains over 97 % activity after multiple reuse cycles. • Hydroxyl radicals (·OH) are the main species driving NCS degradation. The design of visible-light-responsive photocatalytic nanohybrids is emerging as a highly promising strategy for advanced water‐remediation technologies. In this work, a LDH/MOF@Biomass compound was synthesized by coprecipitation and solvo-thermal treatment. Comprehensive characterization (SEM, TEM, BET, XRD, XPS, FTIR) confirmed a well-integrated layered architecture, whose bandgap was reduced to 1.55 eV through the synergistic coupling of MIL-53(Al) crystallites with Mg/Fe anchoring sites. Under a conventional two-stage protocol (dark adsorption followed by photocatalytic irradiation), the material conformed to the Sips isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetics, delivering a maximum adsorption capacity of 12 mg· g −1 and subsequently achieving 95 % removal of 50 mg· L −1 nicosulfuron (NCS) within 120 min. By contrast, a one-step adsorption–photocatalysis configuration achieved complete NCS elimination (< 60 min) under simulated sunlight (750 W· m −2 ), following pseudo-first-order kinetics with an apparent rate constant of 0.15 min −1 . The catalyst retained ≥ 97 % of its initial activity over five successive cycles, with total metal leaching below 1 mg· L −1 (ICP-OES). Radical-scavenging experiments identified hydroxyl radicals (•OH) as the dominant reactive species, while phytotoxicity assays with Brassica oleracea radicles recorded a 53 % reduction in toxicity relative to untreated NCS solutions. Collectively, these findings establish MgFe-LDH/MIL-53(Al)@HC as a cost-effective, recyclable, and energy-efficient photocatalyst for the rapid abatement of sulfonylurea herbicides and structurally related contaminants in aquatic environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beltrón-Vinces et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: