Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Federated learning enables collaborative medical-image modelling without centralising raw data, but client heterogeneity and unstable prototype construction can limit personalised learning. This study presents FedPAXA-Net, a prototype-aligned personalised federated learning framework for eight-class gastrointestinal endoscopy image classification across three dataset-derived clients. The final configuration combines an ImageNet-pretrained ConvNeXt-Base backbone, lightweight client-local residual adapters, robust class prototypes estimated using a 10% coordinate-wise trimmed mean, training-only reliability weighting based on class support, within-class dispersion, and temporal stability, and soft-target cosine prototype alignment. Validation-only component analysis supported removal of ProtoAttention and squeeze-and-excitation recalibration from the final architecture. The data partition was additionally audited using exact hashing, repeated source and sequence identifiers, perceptual-hash screening, and manual review, yielding a final partition of 14,909 images comprising 12,509 training, 1200 validation, and 1200 held-out test images. An earlier controlled same-backbone held-out test benchmark showed that Ditto remained the strongest comparative baseline, motivating architectural simplification rather than a superiority claim for the original full configuration. After the revised architecture and audited partition were frozen, five-seed validation achieved a macro-F1 of 0.971079 ± 0.001115 with a 95% Student- t confidence interval of [ 0.969694 , 0.972464 ] . Following completion of validation-based model selection, the five frozen checkpoints were evaluated once on the untouched held-out test set, yielding a macro-F1 of 0.970665 ± 0.000385 with a 95% confidence interval of [ 0.970187 , 0.971142 ] and a mean worst-client F1 of 0.964961. The results support a simpler, auditable prototype-aligned federated design while highlighting the need for matched final-protocol baselines and independent institutional validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahriar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: