The sensitivity of X-ray phase imaging based on Talbot interferometry is discussed. In order to evaluate the superiority of the technique to the conventional absorption-contrast method, which relies on X-ray absorption, a criterion is proposed. An experimental result of X-ray phase imaging with a Talbot interferometer is compared with the criterion. The criterion is also available for X-ray phase imaging based on Talbot–Lau interferometry. The advantage of X-ray phase imaging based on Talbot(–Lau) interferometry is more prominent when smaller structures are observed with smaller pixels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Momose et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: