Key result
31 mm CoreValve causes anterior mitral leaflet perforation, severe MR, and endocarditis 6 months post-TAVR.
Why the study?
The risk of anterior mitral leaflet injury and subsequent endocarditis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a Corevalve prosthesis has not been previously described.
Case Report (n=1)
No
TAVR with a Corevalve prosthesis carries a potential risk of anterior mitral leaflet perforation and subsequent endocarditis, highlighting the need for meticulous patient evaluation.
Alerts clinicians to rare late mitral perforation after oversized CoreValve; leaves open the incidence, mechanisms, and surveillance needs post-TAVR.
An 84-year-old patient presented at our outpatient clinic with recurrent dyspnoea (NYHA class III) and fever. Medical history included transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using a 31 mm Corevalve prosthesis 6 months ago. Trans-thoracic echocardiography revealed moderate aortic regurgitation and also perforation of the anterior mitral leaflet (AML) causing severe mitral regurgitation (MR; Panels A1 and A2). Thus, the patient was scheduled for open heart surgery. On admission to the hospital 2 weeks later, trans-oesophageal echocardiography showed evidence of acute new onset endocarditis with small vegetations on the AML and an increase in MR (blue arrow; Panels B1 and B2). Blood smear analyses (six out of six) were positive for Staphylococcus epidermidis, and immediate intravenous antibiotic treatment was administered. Aortic valve (SJM Trifecta 27 mm) and mitral valve (SJM Epic 33 mm) replacement was performed. Trans-aortic in situ video-assisted examination confirmed both endocarditis and AML perforation due to the Corevalve prosthesis stent (green arrow; Panels C1 and C2). Intra- and post-operative course was uneventful. The patient recovered well and was discharged without symptoms and normal valve functions 10 days post-operatively. This report highlights three issues: (i) the danger of AML injury following catheter-based aortic valve replacement, which has not been described thus far; (ii) the potential risk of subsequent endocarditis following TAVR; and (iii) the need for meticulous patient evaluation for TAVR. Although this patient was considered at a high surgical risk, based on his age in the first place, he recovered well from standard double-valve replacement. Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal online.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raschpichler et al. (2013) conducted a case report in Anterior mitral leaflet perforation and endocarditis post-TAVR (n=1). Corevalve prosthesis was evaluated. A 31 mm Corevalve prosthesis caused anterior mitral leaflet perforation, severe mitral regurgitation, and subsequent endocarditis 6 months post-TAVR in an 84-year-old patient.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: