Several approaches have been used in evaluating self-compatibility in almond. These include fruit set after self-pollination and bagging, pollen tube growth, and the more recent S f allele identification by molecular markers and gene sequencing. However, none of these methods have given fully reliable results because they all show advantages and limitations. Pollen contamination may distort pollination results as well as inaccuracies during fruit setting operations. Factors other than self-compatibility such as inbreeding may affect fruit set and pollen tube growth. Detection of S alleles by RNase activity and polymerase chain reaction analysis by consensus primers has not always been conclusive. The differential phenotypic expression of the S fa and the S fi alleles has revealed that the presence of the S f allele is not the only requirement for self-compatibility expression in almond. As a consequence, the coding region of the S f allele may not be the sole factor involved in that expression, which may be caused by modifier genes outside this region. Missequencing of alleles has also created confusion for allele identification. Thus, self-compatibility evaluation in almond must involve a better knowledge of the plant material as a whole, and not only of its genotype. All factors involved in setting a commercial crop in conditions of solid plantings of a single cultivar must be put together to evaluate almond self-compatibility. This approach is fundamental for the understanding of self-compatibility in almond and for the evaluation of the new selections in a breeding program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martí et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: