Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a widely used inflammatory biomarker. We evaluated CRP alongside tissue injury markers in non-human primate (NHP) models of kidney and heart allo- and xeno-transplantation to assess CRP's sensitivity in detecting graft-specific inflammatory responses (acute rejection), and explored CRP elevations in the absence of clinically evident graft injury. A secondary objective compared CRP dynamics between NHP species. METHODS: Forty-two baboon or cynomolgus monkey NHPs received kidney (n = 12) or heart (n = 7) xenografts, or kidney (n = 12) or heart (n = 11) allografts. In serum obtained before transplant, after graft revascularization on the day of transplant, and at defined post-operative intervals, CRP, creatinine (kidney), and troponin-I (heart) were measured and correlated with clinical events and histopathology. RESULTS: Baboons exhibited higher baseline and pre-transplant CRP levels than cynomolgus monkeys (p < 0.05). Following kidney xenotransplantation, CRP rose to higher levels in baboons than cynomolgus monkeys (p < 0.05). In association with episodes of histologically confirmed graft rejection, CRP elevations preceded rises in creatinine (kidney) or troponin-I (heart) by 7-14 days. Additionally, CRP elaboration was observed in association with opportunistic infection and surgical procedures such as graft biopsies. CONCLUSION: As reflected by CRP dynamics, systemic inflammation is associated with organ allo- and xenotransplantation in NHPs. We conclude that CRP is a potentially valuable marker of inflammation that, when interpreted alongside organ-specific biomarkers, quantifies the severity of immune activation associated with graft injury and detects additional inflammatory events, which may be clinically occult but influence experimental outcomes. CRP could be a valuable biometric adjunct in multi-parametric inflammation monitoring in transplantation and other disease models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaletel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: