Phase-integral formulas obtained by Fr\"oman, Fr\"oman, and the present author for the limit of uN(l,E,r)/rˡ⁺¹ as r{→}0, where uN(l,E,r) is a normalized nonrelativistic wave function for bound or unbound states, are compared with corresponding formulas obtained by Pratt and co-workers from analytical perturbation theory. It is demonstrated that the phase-integral formulas are practically always advantageous to the perturbation-theory formulas. If one substitutes the perturbation-theory approximation for the energy into the respective phase-integral formula for the limit of uN/rˡ⁺¹ as r{→}0 and performs approximations according to a well-defined scheme, the approximate perturbation-theory formulas for the limit of uN/rˡ⁺¹ as r{→}0 are obtained. For bound s states the phase-integral formula and the perturbation-theory formula coincide with the Fermi-Segr\`e formula in the nonrelativistic approximation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Staffan Yngve (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: