This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to evaluate ultrasound differences in uterine scar between techniques using extramucosal suturing and full thickness suturing of the uterine incision. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study included cases of primary cesarean section. At 6-week postpartum, we evaluated by endovaginal ultrasound two elements in the sagittal view: the thickness of the uterine scar and the surface of defect (niche). Hysterotomy sites closed using a running full-thickness technique including the uterine mucosa (group 1) were compared to hysterotomies operated by the same surgeon but with extramucosal suturing (group 2). The operator switched from the running suture technique to extramucosal in 2013. CONCLUSION: Extramucosal suturing of the uterine scar seems to be associated with a better outcome on the postpartum ultrasound evaluation. KEY POINTS: · The technique for suturing the hysterotomy can be the source of healing changes.. · An extramucosal suturing of the uterus seems to give a better aspect at the postpartum ultrasound.. · Decreasing the niche at cesarean scar may be beneficial for future pregnancies..
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kesrouani et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: