The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of within subject and within tooth variability of attachment-level measurements on hypothesis testing. Full-mouth attachment-level measurements were obtained at 4 sites per tooth in early onset periodontitis subjects (both localized N = 89 and generalized N = 139) and adult periodontitis subjects (N = 309). Variance component models utilizing iterative generalized least squares were employed to estimate the % of variance distributed at the level of the site, tooth and subject in the 3 subject populations. The data indicate that a significant % of the variance is distributed within the tooth and the subject. Ignoring the variance attributable to teeth or subjects can result in inappropriately low type I error rates for hypothesis testing. Thus, both the subjects and the tooth must be considered in the modeling of attachment level measurements. Also in studies in which a limited number of samples are taken, data analysis would be simplified if these samples were taken from different teeth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunsolley et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: