Key result
Anaesthetic Pharmacology Review offers concise, structured updates on recent pharmacology research for clinicians and researchers.
Why the study?
There is a need to present recent research and new ideas on anesthetic drugs and provide continuing education focused on specific subjects in anesthetic pharmacology.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
Anesthesiologists and researchers in anesthetic pharmacology
Design
Review articles authored by experts
May streamline pharmacology updates for anesthesiologists; leaves open prospective evaluation of educational impact.
This new-niche journal has three broad purposes: to "present recent research and new ideas" concerning drugs employed in anesthesiology; to fulfill a continuing education function, particularly for those studying for examinations; and to focus each issue on one subject. The intended audiences are anesthesiologists and researchers in anesthetic pharmacology. Anaesthetic Pharmacology Reviewfor the most part achieves these goals. Reviews offer concise, well-organized summaries of the more recent, generally accepted theories in each research area covered. The majority are authored by well-known experts in the field. The reviews are best suited as first-line sources for preparing a lecture, conference, or grand rounds presentation, or for pursuing further research on topics with a fairly narrow focus. While the subjects covered will be of interest to most practitioners in anesthetic pharmacology, the anesthesiologist in an academic medical center will find this new journal to be especially useful. Clinicians or physicians studying for
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan D. Eldredge (1994) reported a review. Anaesthetic Pharmacology Review provides concise, well-organized summaries of recent research in anesthetic pharmacology, serving as a useful resource for academic anesthesiologists and researchers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: