Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Laser therapy is the optimal approach for treating port-wine stains, but whether it is effective for patients with facial dermatomal port-wine stains and Sturge-Weber syndrome is undetermined. This project aimed to verify the incidence of Sturge-Weber syndrome and glaucoma within the population, compare the response in syndromic and nonsyndromic patients with facial dermatomal port-wine stains to laser, and determine the treatment response in relation to dermatome and color. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 874 patients with facial port-wine stains (203 displayed a dermatomal pattern). Pretreatment and posttreatment photographs were assessed clinically and recorded on a statistically reliable percentage gradient. RESULTS: Sturge-Weber syndrome was diagnosed in 30 patients. Twelve patients had glaucoma, with the port-wine stains involving the ophthalmic (V1) division of the trigeminal nerve. The highest proportion of patients with glaucoma came from those with involvement of the maxillary (V2) and/or mandibular (V3) division of the trigeminal nerve. No patients had Sturge-Weber syndrome with V3 port-wine stains alone. After laser therapy, only 45 percent of syndromal patients and 55 percent of nonsyndromic patients had a satisfactory outcome (>50 percent) in color and size reduction of dermatomal port-wine stains. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of Sturge-Weber syndrome was 3 percent in patients with a facial port-wine stain. There was an increased risk of Sturge-Weber syndrome with involvement of V1 port-wine stains and no risk with involvement of V3 port-wine stains alone. Laser treatment produced unsatisfactory outcomes in patients with facial dermatomal port-wine stains. V3 port-wine stains responded best and V2 worst to laser.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hennedige et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: