Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Over the past 30 years, a growing amount of scholarly attention has been paid to forms of constitutional interpretation other than judicial review, ranging from departmentalism to explicitly removing judicial review from the court's purview. As many of these works have recognized, such skepticism is not new, but has a strong historical tradition. What has not often been noted, however, is that differing conceptions of judicial review—even opposition to judicial oversight of legislative actions—existed nearly from the moment thatMarbury v. Madisonwas decided. This article examines some of these divergent opinions on judicial review in the Early Republic by studying how it was perceived by the Old Republicans, the conservative faction of the Virginia Jeffersonians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jordan T. Cash (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: