Key result
RT3DE evaluates rheumatic tricuspid valve stenosis but quantitative comparative outcomes remain unreported.
Why the study?
Tricuspid valve stenosis in rheumatic heart disease is often missed clinically and difficult to fully assess with two-dimensional echocardiography, necessitating improved imaging techniques.
Does RT3DE improve tricuspid valve assessment compared to 2DE in patients with rheumatic tricuspid valve stenosis?
Observational (n=13)
Does RT3DE improve tricuspid valve assessment compared to 2DE in patients with rheumatic tricuspid valve stenosis?
RT3DE may be a valuable imaging modality for the examination of stenotic tricuspid valves by allowing simultaneous visualization of all leaflets.
May support RT3DE for tricuspid leaflet visualization in rheumatic stenosis; leaves open quantitative superiority over 2DE.
Rheumatic heart disease causes tricuspid valve stenosis in up to 8% of patients.1 Unfortunately, tricuspid valve stenosis is easily missed at clinical examination except in advanced cases when a high degree of clinical suspicion exists.2 Undetected and thus uncorrected tricuspid valve stenosis may lead to postoperative low cardiac output despite successful relief of left-sided valve disease and carries a high mortality and morbidity.3 Two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) can detect thickened tricuspid valve leaflets and a reduced tricuspid valve orifice diameter, and continuous-wave Doppler allows estimation of the tricuspid transvalvular pressure gradient.4 However, in most patients, it is not possible to visualise all three tricuspid valve leaflets simultaneously with 2DE.5 Transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) may be a valuable imaging modality for the examination of stenotic tricuspid valves because all leaflets can be seen simultaneously and studied from both atrial and ventricular aspects. This study aimed to apply RT3DE for tricuspid valve assessment in patients with rheumatic tricuspid valve stenosis. Five patients (mean (SD) age 33 (7) years, four men) with an established diagnosis of rheumatic tricuspid valve disease were examined by 2DE (Philips Sonos 7500 with S3 probe, Best, The Netherlands) and RT3DE (same system with X4 probe). These patients were compared with eight patients …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anwar et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Rheumatic tricuspid valve stenosis (n=13). Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) vs. Two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) was evaluated. The abstract is truncated and does not report the quantitative results of the evaluation of rheumatic tricuspid valve stenosis by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: