Key result
Anticoagulant therapy for cerebral thromboembolism remains controversial due to existing statistics being obtained without adequate attention to fundamental principles of clinical science.
Why the study?
Anticoagulant therapy in cerebral thromboembolism remains controversial with unresolved questions about optimal agents, duration, complications, and therapy by event type.
Does anticoagulant therapy provide therapeutic benefits that outweigh complications in patients with various types of cerebral thromboembolic events?
Does anticoagulant therapy provide therapeutic benefits that outweigh complications in patients with various types of cerebral thromboembolic events?
This critical review highlights the ongoing controversies and methodological flaws in historical studies evaluating anticoagulant therapy for cerebral thromboembolism.
Clinicians should await rigorous trials before routine use; leaves open net benefit of anticoagulants in cerebral thromboembolism.
Anticoagulant therapy in the treatment of cerebral thromboembolism remains controversial despite 20 years of statistical studies. Among the unresolved questions are (1) the relative value of aspirin vs coumarin derivatives for long-term therapy; (2) the relative benefits of long-term therapy vs short-term therapy; (3) the complications of anticoagulant therapy vs their therapeutic benefits; and (4) the optimal therapy of the various types of cerebral thromboembolic events, eg, transient ischemic attacks, strokes in evolution, and completed strokes. Much of this controversy derives from the same problems that have plagued the question of anticoagulation for acute myocardial infarction, namely that "the existing statistics were obtained without adequate attention to fundamental principles of clinical science". We have examined the available clinical studies bearing on this issue and are reporting our analysis of these studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
F. D. Cervantes (1975) conducted a review in Cerebral thromboembolism. Anticoagulant therapy was evaluated. Anticoagulant therapy for cerebral thromboembolism remains controversial due to existing statistics being obtained without adequate attention to fundamental principles of clinical science.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: