Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Airflow simulation results depend on a good prediction of near wall turbulence.In this paper a comparative study between different near wall treatments is presented.It is applied to two test cases in building: (1) the first concerns flow through a long corridor which is similar to that in a fully developed plane channel.Simulation results are compared to direct numerical simulation (DNS) data of Moser et al. (1999) for Re τ = 590 (where Re τ denotes the friction Reynolds number defined by friction velocity u τ , kinematics viscosity ν and the channel half-width δ); (2) the second case is a benchmark test for room air distribution.Simulation results are compared to experimental data obtained with laser-Doppler anemometry (Nielsen, 1990).Simulations were performed with the aid of CFD code Fluent (2005).Near wall treatments available in Fluent were tested: Standard Wall Functions, Non Equilibrium Wall Function and Enhanced Wall Treatment.In each case, suitable meshes with adequate position of the first near-wall node are needed.Results of near-wall mean stream wise velocity u + and turbulent kinetic energy k + profiles are presented, variables with the superscript of + are those non dimensional by the wall friction velocity u τ and the kinematic viscosity ν.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gharbi et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: