Rather than stariing with a definition of postmoderuism as referring either to a condition of contemporary life, or a textual, aesthetic practice, I want to begin by suggesting that the recent debates on postmodernism possess both a positive attraction and a usefulness to the analyst of popular culture. This is because they offer a wider, and more dynamic, understanding of contemporary representation than other accounts to date. Unlike the various strands of structuralist criticism, postmodernism considers images as they relate to and across each other. Postmodernism deflects attention away from the singular scrutinizing gaze of the semiologist, and asks that this be replaced by a multiplicity of fragmented, and frequently interrupted, looks. The exemplary text or the single, richly coded, image, gives way to the textual thickness and the visual density of everyday life, as though the slow, even languid look of the semiologist is, by the 1980’s, out of tempo with the times. The field of postmodernism certainly expresses a frustration, not merely with this seemingly languid pace, but with its increasing inability to make tangible
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ángela McRobbie (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: