This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The recently approved IEEE 802.15.4a standard defines an ultra-wideband (UWB) based physical layer using concatenated coding with mixed binary phase-shift keying and binary pulse-position modulation (BPSK-BPPM) and direct-sequence spreading with time hopping. The concatenated code consists of an outer Reed-Solomon (RS) and an inner convolutional code, and the coding and modulation are combined such that both coherent and noncoherent receiver architectures are supported. In this paper, the error-rate performance of IEEE 802.15.4a compliant UWB radios is investigated. To this end, semi-analytical expressions for the bit-error rate (BER) and frame-error rate (FER) of the coded UWB system are derived. The presented framework is comprehensive in that (i) different methods for generating reliability information (i.e., decoding metrics), (ii) the effects of suboptimal multipath combining, and (iii) coherent and noncoherent reception methods are included. Furthermore, a particularly suited errors-and-erasures RS decoding scheme is devised. The evaluation of the error-rate expressions together with simulation results for realistic UWB channels show that (i) the error-rate approximations are tight over wide ranges of BER and FER, (ii) symbol-wise metrics are clearly advantageous over bit-wise metrics for decoding of the convolutional code, (iii) combining the 5 to 10 strongest multipath components approaches the performance of full combining within 1-2 dB for residential and 3-5 dB for outdoor UWB environments, and (iv) the simplicity of noncoherent detection comes at loss of more than 10 dB in signal-to-noise ratio compared to coherent detection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmadian et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: