Key result
Systemic disease history is linked to ~6-fold higher odds of abnormal preoperative PT INR.
Why the study?
The utility of routine preoperative laboratory tests before oral and maxillofacial surgery is controversial, with differing opinions on their necessity.
Observational (n=5,022)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports selective preoperative testing based on known systemic disease; leaves open routine lab utility in asymptomatic patients without history.
IntroductionPreoperative assessments of the general status of patients before oral and maxillofacial surgery are often based on information reported by patients.However, the information can be limited, and the patient could intentionally hide underlying disease or not recognize abnormal health status.In a dental office, there are many surgical procedures performed under local anesthesia, and patients are often nervous and frightened.An urgent situation such as cardiac arrest, anaphylactic shock, syncope, or hypoglycemic shock can be encountered in the local clinic 1 .Preoperative evaluation is a basic and important step for identification of previously undetermined conditions that may place the patient at risk during surgery and the postoperative period as well as assessment of known conditions 2 .The utility of routine preoperative laboratory tests is controversial.Some authors encourage routine tests, while others suggest only obtaining a patient history and physical examination 3 .As life expectancy increases, the number of elderly patients who require oral and maxillofacial surgical treatment has also increased.There is also a need for a more professional and reliable treatment process under the Korean dental specialist system.A careful preoperative
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seo et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Minor oral surgery (surgical extraction or dental implant) (n=5,022). History of systemic disease vs. No known past medical history was evaluated on Abnormal prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT INR) (OR 5.721, 95% CI 3.284-9.966, p=<0.001). Patients with a known history of systemic disease had significantly higher odds of abnormal preoperative laboratory results, including a 5.7-fold increased odds of abnormal PT INR, compared to those without a known medical history.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: