Four magnetic samples with different building blocks and dimensionalities, {[Cu(4)(atr)(2)(μ(3)-OH)(2)(sip)(2)]·4H(2)O}(n) (1), {[Cu(4)(atr)(2)(H(2)O)(8)(μ-OH)(2)(sip)(2)]·1.3CH(3)OH·0.7H(2)O}(n) (2), {[Cu(3)(atr)(4)(H(2)O)(2)(sip)(2)]·4H(2)O}(n) (3) and {[Cu(3)(atr)(4)(H(2)O)(2)(μ(3)-OH)(sip)(Hsip)]·2CH(3)OH·2.75H(2)O}(n) (4) (atr = 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole and sip(3-) = 5-sulfoisophthalate), were obtained and characterized structurally and magnetically. Complex 1 exhibits a three-dimensional (3D) robust framework with butterfly-like Cu(II)(4) clusters periodically extended by tetratopic sip(3-) connectors. Complex 2 possesses a 2D layer with alternating Cu(II)(3) + Cu(II)(1) chains crosslinked by pairs of ditopic sip(3-) linkers. By contrast, the latter two entities feature 1D broad ribbons with linear (for 3) and triangular Cu(II)(3) cores (for 4) propagated by bidirectional sip(3-) connectors. Structural analysis reveals that the diverse building blocks and dimensionalities of 1-4 are significantly dominated by the tunable coordination of exocyclic amino- and/or sulfonate-group of the mixed ligands. Magnetically, antiferromagnetic interactions with variable strength transmitted by -NN- moiety of atr and hydroxyl mediators result in overall S = 0 (for 1) and 1/2 (for 3 and 4) spin ground states. These interesting results indicate that coordinative side group in the ternary metal ion-azolate-carboxylate system can be utilized to generate aesthetically pleasing building units and variably polytopic connectors, leading to differently extended superstructures and magnetic behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: