Aggregate piers, also known as stone columns, are a commonly used ground improvement technique to stiffen existing soils for the support of structure foundations. This paper presents an evaluation of existing analytical expressions for the bearing capacity of spread footings supported on aggregate pier reinforced clay. The accuracy of these models was investigated using a database of high-quality footing load test data. The existing models were compared using the bias (i.e., the ratio of measured and calculated bearing capacity), and they produced a wide range in predicted bearing capacities. Selected analytical models were empirically modified using the load test database, and this resulted in improved accuracy and reduced variability. Back-calculated aggregate pier bearing capacity and cavity expansion factors are shown to be inversely proportional to undrained shear strength, and therefore to the ultimate confining pressure available at failure. This finding is attributed to the curved failure envelope of the angular aggregate used in pier construction. Additionally, a multiple nonlinear regression model suitable for spread footings resting on aggregate piers under a wide range of pier configurations is presented. The regression model is shown to produce more accurate bearing capacity estimates than existing analytical models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stuedlein et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: