Siegel's (1977) interpretation that his reaction time results were solely a function of response factors (movement amplitude and target diameter) was discussed and criticized. It was argued that Siegel's interpretation was inappropriate because stimulus factors (eccentric and visual angle) and response factors were confounded. It was also argued that the surprising U-shaped relation between reaction time and movement amplitude was probably the result of the confounding between stimulus and response factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christina et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: