In this study, Co/Zr-metal organic framework (MOF) precursors were obtained by a room-temperature liquid-phase precipitation method and the equivalent-volume impregnation method, respectively, using a Zr-MOF as the support, and Co/Zr-MOF-M and Co/Zr-MOF-N catalysts were prepared after calcination in a hydrogen–argon mixture gases ( V Ar : V H 2 = 9 : 1 ) at 350 °C for 2 h. The catalytic activities of the prepared samples for CO 2 methanation under atmospheric-pressure cold plasma were studied. The results showed that Co/Zr-MOF-M had a good synergistic effect with cold plasma. At a discharge power of 13.0 W, V H 2 : V CO 2 = 4 : 1 and a gas flow rate of 30 ml·min −1 , the CO 2 conversion was 58.9% and the CH 4 selectivity reached 94.7%, which was higher than for Co/Zr-MOF-N under plasma (CO 2 conversion 24.8%, CH 4 selectivity 9.8%). X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, N 2 adsorption and desorption (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis results showed that Co/Zr-MOF-M and Co/Zr-MOF-N retained a good Zr-MOF framework structure, and the Co oxide was uniformly dispersed on the surface of the Zr-MOF. Compared with Co/Zr-MOF-N, the Co/Zr-MOF-M catalyst has a larger specific surface area and higher Co 2+ /Co total and Co/Zr ratios. Additionally, the Co oxide in Co/Zr-MOF-M is distributed on the surface of the Zr-MOF in the form of porous particles, which may be the main reason why the catalytic activity of Co/Zr-MOF-M is higher than that of Co/Zr-MOF-N.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: