Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study proposes a lightweight domain-assisted deep learning framework for binary human presence detection using ultra-wideband (UWB) radar. The proposed methodology processes raw UWB radar signals through statistically screened, physics-grounded signal features including Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)-based frequency-domain statistics and Hilbert Transform (HT)-derived envelope statistics which are selected via a per-subject Cohen’s d screening step and stacked as auxiliary input channels alongside the raw signal for a lightweight two-dimensional convolutional neural network (2D-CNN). A cross-subject evaluation protocol (train-on-one-subject, test-on-the-other) is adopted to assess generalization across individuals rather than relying on a pooled, sample-level split. Among the candidate features, a Frequency Standard Deviation (FSTD) is shown to match or exceed the performance of every multi-feature combination tested, indicating that targeted feature selection is more consequential than input fusion for this task. To further improve deployment efficiency, post-training INT8 quantization is applied, reducing the model to approximately 23 KB while preserving classification performance for quantization-robust configurations. Hardware-in-the-loop benchmarking on the STEdgeAI platform indicates on-device inference times ranging from approximately 0.88 ms on AI-enabled STM32N6 hardware to 117–130 ms on STM32H7-class microcontrollers; these figures reflect model inference only and exclude radar acquisition and preprocessing time. Experiments are conducted on a two-subject (one male, one female) indoor dataset; the reported cross-subject results are presented as a relative comparison across feature and quantization configurations rather than as an estimate of population-level generalization. The findings nonetheless illustrate the feasibility of combining principled feature selection with quantization-aware, hardware-validated deployment on embedded artificial intelligence (AI) platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yousefi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: