Key result
Early ICD therapy in ARVC may lower arrhythmic death but increases device-related complications.
Why the study?
The efficacy and appropriate use of ICD therapy in patients with RVOT-VT and early stage ARVD/C remain unclear and controversial.
Does implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy reduce arrhythmic death in patients with right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia (RVOT-VT) and early stage arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia / cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C)?
Does implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy reduce arrhythmic death in patients with right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia (RVOT-VT) and early stage arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia / cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C)?
Careful risk-benefit consideration is needed for ICD implantation in early-stage ARVD/C, while RVOT-VT patients typically do not require ICDs due to the effectiveness of catheter ablation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports individualized ICD risk-benefit assessment in early ARVD/C; leaves open need for prospective trials to define optimal timing.
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) improve the survival of patients with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and a reduced ejection fraction. However, the efficacy of ICD therapy in patients with right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia (RVOT-VT) and early stage arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia / cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) has not been well clarified. Although the prognosis of RVOT-VT is generally good, malignant forms of RVOT-VT resulting in polymorphic VT have been reported by several investigators. Radiofrequency catheter ablation is still effective in such patients, and thus an ICD implantation is usually not required. On the other hand, according to the current guidelines in patients with ARVD/C, an ICD implantation is recommended for secondary prevention when the patients develop sustained VT or VF. An ICD implantation may also be considered for primary prevention in high-risk patients: extensive disease, family history of sudden cardiac death, or undiagnosed syncope. Since an ICD implantation in the early stage of ARVD/C is controversial, physicians should well consider its risks and benefits. Early intervention with ICD therapy in ARVD/C patients may reduce the arrhythmic death rate but increases the device related complications especially in younger patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aizawa et al. (2014) conducted a review in Right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia (RVOT-VT) and early stage arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy was evaluated. Early intervention with ICD therapy in ARVD/C patients may reduce the arrhythmic death rate but increases device-related complications, especially in younger patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: