Research Article| November 01, 2005 Tectonic inferences from the ca. 1255–1100 Ma Unkar Group and Nankoweap Formation, Grand Canyon: Intracratonic deformation and basin formation during protracted Grenville orogenesis J. Michael Timmons; J. Michael Timmons 1New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Karl E. Karlstrom; Karl E. Karlstrom 2Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Matthew. T. Heizler; Matthew. T. Heizler 3New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Samuel A. Bowring; Samuel A. Bowring 4Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar George E. Gehrels; George E. Gehrels 5Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Laura J. Crossey Laura J. Crossey 6Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information J. Michael Timmons 1New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA Karl E. Karlstrom 2Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA Matthew. T. Heizler 3New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA Samuel A. Bowring 4Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA George E. Gehrels 5Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA Laura J. Crossey 6Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 02 Dec 2003 Revision Received: 26 Jun 2004 Accepted: 02 Sep 2004 First Online: 08 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2005) 117 (11-12): 1573–1595. https://doi.org/10.1130/B25538.1 Article history Received: 02 Dec 2003 Revision Received: 26 Jun 2004 Accepted: 02 Sep 2004 First Online: 08 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation J. Michael Timmons, Karl E. Karlstrom, Matthew. T. Heizler, Samuel A. Bowring, George E. Gehrels, Laura J. Crossey; Tectonic inferences from the ca. 1255–1100 Ma Unkar Group and Nankoweap Formation, Grand Canyon: Intracratonic deformation and basin formation during protracted Grenville orogenesis. GSA Bulletin 2005;; 117 (11-12): 1573–1595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B25538.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract The Unkar Group of the Grand Canyon Supergroup is one of the best-preserved remnants of Mesoproterozoic sedimentary rocks in the southwestern United States. It provides an exceptional record of intracratonic basin formation and associated tectonics kinematically compatible with protracted "Grenville-age" NW-directed shortening. New U/Pb age determinations from an air-fall tephra at the base of the Unkar Group dates the onset of deposition at ca. 1255 Ma, and 40Ar/39Ar K-feldspar thermochronology in the Grand Canyon indicates that basement rocks cooled through 150 °C between ca. 1300 and 1250 Ma, refining exhumation rates of basement rocks just prior to Unkar deposition. Abrupt thickness and facies changes in conglomerate and dolomite of the Bass Formation (lower Unkar Group) associated with NE-striking monoclinal flexures indicate NW-directed synsedimentary contraction at ca. 1250 Ma. A large disconformity (∼75 m.y. duration) is inferred between the lower and upper Unkar Group and is located below the upper Hakatai Shale, as documented by detrital zircons. A second style of Unkar Group deformation involved the development of half grabens and full grabens that record NE-SW extension on NW-striking, high-angle normal faults. Several observations indicate that NW-striking normal faulting was concurrent with upper Unkar deposition, mafic magmatism, and early Nankoweap deposition: (1) intraformational faulting in the Bass Formation, (2) intraformational faulting in the 1070 Ma (old Rb/Sr date) Cardenas Basalt and lower Nankoweap Formation, (3) syntectonic relationships between Dox deposition and 1104 Ma (new Ar/Ar date) diabase intrusion, and (4) an angular unconformity between Unkar Group and Nankoweap strata. The two tectonic phases affecting the Unkar Group (ca. 1250 Ma and ca. 1100 Ma) provide new insight into tectonics of southern Laurentia: (1) Laramide-style (monoclines) deformation in the continental interior at ca. 1250 Ma records Grenville-age shortening; and (2) ca. 1100 Ma detrital muscovite (Ar/Ar) and zircon (U/Pb) indicate an Unkar Group source in the Grenville-age highlands of southwestern Laurentia during development of NW-striking extensional basins. We conclude that far-field stresses related to Grenville-age orogenesis (NW shortening and orthogonal NE-SW extension) dominated the sedimentary and tectonic regime of southwestern Laurentia from 1250 to 1100 Ma. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Timmons et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: