Key result
The use of a subcutaneous closed suction drain significantly reduced the incidence of surgical site infection compared to no drain (16.3% vs 36.2%, OR 0.344) after emergency laparotomy for perforation peritonitis.
Why the study?
Does a subcutaneous closed suction drain reduce the incidence of surgical site infection in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for perforation peritonitis?
Cohort (n=90)
No
Does a subcutaneous closed suction drain reduce the incidence of surgical site infection in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for perforation peritonitis?
Odds Ratio: 0.344 (95% CI 0.126–0.937)
Absolute Event Rate: 16.3% vs 36.2%
p-value: p=0.033
The use of a subcutaneous closed suction drain significantly reduces the incidence of surgical site infections following emergency laparotomy for perforation peritonitis.
Local SSI incidence may inform institutional audits; leaves open multicenter trials before broader adoption.
Background: Generalized peritonitis as a result of gastrointestinal perforation is a common surgical emergency and one of important morbidity is surgical site infection (SSI). Objectives: to evaluate the incidence of SSI after emergency laparotomy for perforation peritonitis. Methodology: A prospective interventional study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital, Sylhet from December 2019 to November 2020. Ninety patients who underwent emergency laparotomy for perforation peritonitis aged 18 years or above were included. After laparotomy standard closure technique was applied in all cases and subcutaneous closed suction drain was given in 43 cases. Results: The mean age of the patients was 32.59 ± 11.88 years, 58.9% of patients were in 21-40 years and male preponderance (66.7%). Peritonitis was most commonly due to peptic ulcer perforation (38.7%) followed by burst appendix (27.8%). Incidence of SSI was 26.7%. Subcutaneous closed suction drain was used in 47.8% of cases and its use reduced the incidence of SSI [OR=0.344 (95% CI=0.126-0.937) χ2=4.543; p=0.033]. Conclusion: Perforation peritonitis is associated with higher incidence of SSI and subcutaneous closed suction drain is effective in reducing the chances of SSI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akter et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Perforation peritonitis (n=90). Subcutaneous closed suction drain vs. No subcutaneous suction drain was evaluated on Incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) (OR 0.344, 95% CI 0.126-0.937, p=0.033). The use of a subcutaneous closed suction drain significantly reduced the incidence of surgical site infection compared to no drain (16.3% vs 36.2%, OR 0.344) after emergency laparotomy for perforation peritonitis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: