Key result
Pioglitazone fails to reduce maximal platelet aggregation vs. placebo in T2D on DAPT.
Why the study?
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have impaired clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effects possibly due to reduced insulin sensitivity and upregulation of P2Y12 signalling, and it is hypothesised that insulin sensitising strategies may enhance clopidogrel-mediated P2Y12 inhibition.
Does pioglitazone improve clopidogrel-mediated P2Y12 inhibitory effects in patients with T2DM and stable coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=15)
double-blind
cross-over
Does pioglitazone improve clopidogrel-mediated P2Y12 inhibitory effects in patients with T2DM and stable coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 49.53% vs 52.52%
p-value: p=0.594
In patients with T2DM on maintenance aspirin and clopidogrel, adjunctive pioglitazone does not enhance inhibition of platelet P2Y12 mediated signalling.
Pioglitazone adds no antiplatelet benefit in T2DM on aspirin/clopidogrel; challenges hypothesized PPAR-γ effects on platelet aggregation.
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have impaired clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effects, which may be in part attributed to their reduced sensitivity to insulin and consequently, results in upregulation of the P2Y12 signalling pathway. It has been hypothesised that insulin sensitising strategies may enhance clopidogrel-mediated P2Y12 inhibitory effects. The aim of this pilot pharmacodynamics (PD) study was to assess the impact of pioglitazone on clopidogrel-mediated P2Y12 inhibitory effects in patients with T2DM. This was a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over PD study. Patients with T2DM and stable coronary artery disease on maintenance aspirin and clopidogrel were randomised to receive either pioglitazone 30 mg or matching placebo daily for 14 days. PD assessments were measured at baseline, 14 days after randomisation, at the end of the wash-out period, and 14 days after cross-over. The primary endpoint measure was maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) to 20 μM adenosine diphosphate (ADP) as assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA). Flow cytometric analysis of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP-PRI), and VerifyNow P2Y12 testing were also performed. A total of 15 randomised patients completed the study. MPA to 20 μM ADP (primary endpoint) was not significantly different with pioglitazone compared with placebo (49.53 ± 4.76 vs. 52.52 ± 3.89%; p = 0.594). Similarly, other PD measures did not differ significantly between the groups. In conclusion, in patients with T2DM on maintenance aspirin and clopidogrel therapy, the adjunctive use of pioglitazone does not result in enhanced inhibition of platelet P2Y12 mediated signalling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suryadevara et al. (2012) conducted an RCT in type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable coronary artery disease (n=15). pioglitazone vs. matching placebo was evaluated on maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) to 20 μM adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (p=0.594). Adjunctive pioglitazone did not significantly reduce maximal platelet aggregation compared with placebo in patients with T2DM on maintenance aspirin and clopidogrel (49.53% vs. 52.52%; p=0.594).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: