We analyzed the claim that accommodative esotropia tends to deteriorate with greater frequency if the accommodation convergence relationship (AC/A) is high. Records of 119 patients whose eyes were aligned with spectacles alone were studied. Their AC/A relationships were graded according to the difference between the distance and near measurements: normal included 0 to 9 prism diopters (delta) difference; grade 1 ranged from 10 to 19 delta difference; grade 2 from 20 to 29 delta difference; and in grade 3 the difference was 30 delta or greater. Deterioration is characterized by a nonaccommodative component of esotropia greater than 10 delta at distance becoming superimposed on the initial accommodative esotropia. Deterioration occurred in 7.7% of patients with a normal AC/A, 25% with grade 1 high AC/A, 44% with grade 2 high AC/A, and 52% with grade 3 high AC/A. Hypotheses were investigated using chi square, t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and log linear analyses. Distributional differences were highly significant by chi square test (p = 0.001) with a rejection of the null hypothesis of no difference between the groups at the alpha = 0.05 level. An alternate analysis of average AC/A ratio in the deteriorated versus nondeteriorated patients was equally statistically significant by the t-test. Hypermetropia was significantly higher in the normal AC/A group. Multi-factor comparisons showed that time-to-deterioration, treatment delay, age of onset, and amblyopia were factors that did not relate significantly to the incidence of deterioration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ludwig et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: