Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Numerous studies have shown that compared to individuals from intact, biological families, individuals in stepfamilies tend to fare worse emotionally, socially, physically, and psychologically (e.g., Amato & Keith, 1991). Several studies have attempted to account for the discrepancy, but the research has not yielded definitive results. The current study evaluated attachment to parents as a possible explanation for discrepancies in psychological well-being. The results confirmed that attachment was a significant predictor of well-being. Additionally, individuals from stepfamilies were found to have less secure attachment to their parents than individuals from intact, biological families. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that attachment (operationalized as maternal and paternal care) partially mediated the relationship between family type (intact, biological family vs. stepfamily) and psychological well-being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Love et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: