Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MOTIVATION: The computational modeling of peptide display by class I major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) is essential for peptide-based therapeutics design. Existing computational methods for peptide-display focus on modeling the peptide-MHC-binding affinity. However, such models are not able to characterize the sequence features for the other cellular processes in the peptide display pathway that determines MHC ligand selection. RESULTS: We introduce a semi-supervised model, DeepLigand that outperforms the state-of-the-art models in MHC Class I ligand prediction. DeepLigand combines a peptide language model and peptide binding affinity prediction to score MHC class I peptide presentation. The peptide language model characterizes sequence features that correspond to secondary factors in MHC ligand selection other than binding affinity. The peptide embedding is learned by pre-training on natural ligands, and can discriminate between ligands and non-ligands in the absence of binding affinity prediction. Although conventional affinity-based models fail to classify peptides with moderate affinities, DeepLigand discriminates ligands from non-ligands with consistently high accuracy. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We make DeepLigand available at https://github.com/gifford-lab/DeepLigand. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: